Followers

Friday, 11 March 2016

TRAIN JOURNEY FROM MUMBAI TO CHENNAI

While Travelling by Train from Mumbai to Chennai…. 13/02/2016

It was a pathetic and inhuman experience from my part in train; I could find different people men and women, boys and girls, transgender and many other if I wish to classify; but I am not interested in classification of travellers rather the incident which I show and I realize; there was a man of 40 to 50 years of age who had unreserved ticket, he might have thought because of his defacement of body people will allow him to seat at least near door of 2nd class reserved compartment, he boarded between the station thinking I could be safe without much tension of overcrowd or hanging with each other in general compartment since I am having acute wounds in my body. And there were people of different behavior towards to acute wounded man; some could buy eatable things and served him, some could talk to him with hopefully, some could not see his wounded body, could spited on him, and some are indifferent to him, some gave some money and so many observation that was on mind. My mind flashed back to the treatment that upper class and caste gives to lower class or caste; the form of discrimination, the untouchability, and in the form of purity and pollution. And also lot of things like dharma and karma which usually varna system indulge in Hindu caste system, since he is getting painful life, because of his karma or dharma which always we relates.

In this train people of different class, caste, groups, genders and religion present but it was the upset to see as we belong to 21st century of globalized, modernized and westernized era, things that are happening is really intolerable. And it was the whole episode of Tamil Brahmins who were travelling to Chennai who deny the person and look down upon him; they don’t even bother to see his condition. They actually forced him to get down in between the station; as we know everybody has some destination to reach, may be he had also some destination to reached, actually speaking he was not a beggar; I could see him having more than thousand rupees in his hand; may be he was on the way to treatment or assume it like that. I think what is wrong with them simply forcing him to get out from train.

Later the train arrived at station; these groups of Brahmin called railway police and let the wounded man has to get down- this was just usual but later Tamil Brahmin called the railway clearers (toilet and washroom) and tell them to clean the whole compartment; which I was not expecting at all; though clearers clear toilet and washing bowls where we usually do hand wash and brash our teeth; they were so adamant and insisted them to clean because a wounded man was polluted the compartment which will polluted them too. There is a stereotype which haunted in the incident.

If one can analyze this point in other way as western and modernized free thinking man; I think they would have been much rational and scientific in their outlook and nature; would have helped him to cure; since they were of upper class, economically sound and possess power, position and prestige. And they would have been highlighted as one of the Good Samaritan. But it never happen in this circumstance; and there was an interesting things to be noted which really caught my mind there was a transgender who was also travelling in this compartment to Chennai; and this transgender was had reserved ticket but people in this the compartment were not happy to see the transgender; they were not giving any respect to the transgender but some of the people who are of free thinking they would ask and talk with transgender which usually first and second gender people don’t mix with third gender people; they always ignore and make fun of them, but this transgender was given some kinds of human dignity some coffee and some eatable were sponsored for the transgender.


Thursday, 3 March 2016

UNDERSTANDING CONCEPT AND ORIGIN OF SUBALTERN STUDIES

What is all about Subaltern Studies?

In critical theory and post-colonialism, ‘subaltern’ refers to population who are socially, politically and geographically outside the hegemonic power structure of colony and colonial homeland. To describe ‘history told from below’ the tern subaltern is derived from Antonio Gramsci’s work ‘cultural hegemony’ which identifies the groups that are excluded from established structure of society for political representation; therefore there is denial of means to have their voice heard in society.

The term subaltern and subaltern studies come to exist in post-colonial era with the work of subaltern studies group, a collection of south Asian historians who play political actor role of men and women as mass population rather than political role of social and economic elites in history of south Asia.

Marxist historian were investigating colonial history as told from perspectives of proletariat, using the concept of social class to determine economic relation between bourgeois and proletariat. In 1970s there was start of subaltern perspective in which history is told from colonized people from Indian subcontinent rather than colonizers.

The ‘Subaltern’ concept is of problematic, because it originates from Eurocentric method of enquiry in the study of non-western people of Asian, Africa and Middle East. From its inception as historical research model of study of Colonial experience in south Asian peoples, it transformed from model of intellectual discourse into method of ‘vigorous post-colonial critique’.

The term ‘subaltern’ is used in the field of history, anthropology, sociology, human geography and literature criticism.

In Postcolonial theory, subaltern describes as lower classes and social groups who are at the margin of a society- a subaltern is a person rendered without agency due to his/her social status.

In Phenomenology the other and the constituting other each identity a cumulative, constituting factor in the self-image of a person –the acknowledge of being real.

Imperialism/colonialism in which imperialist world systems, political and economic affairs of empires were fragmented and empires ‘provide for most...........

Saturday, 30 January 2016

UNDERSTANDING CONVERSION IN RELIGIONS

Conversions are more about  the promise of a better life than faith. It is not mandatory or compulsion for every individual. When one read article Approaches to the study of Conversion to Islam in India by Richard M. Eaton from- Religion Movements in South Asia 600-1800 (book) ed. David N. Lorenzen; OUP New Delhi PP 105-127 which explain the thought of conversion in obvious manner but that's not sufficient to speak conversion such this or that. It is a complex social, political, and religious phenomena.

In this article author tries his best to explain the different approaches through which Islam is spread all over the world or do they covert or do have are forced or what it is so much so there is a talk of religious conversion; he put forward some approaches like
  1. Religion of the Sword theory
  2. Political patronage theory
  3. Religion of social liberation 
These three approaches for him not convincing or inadequate to explain; that people covert to Islam, there is something called 
      4. Theory of Conversion: Accretion and Reform 

Friday, 29 January 2016

THE DAY I WAS WITH FRIENDS

Just the third semester examination over, I was overwhelm with joy; many times it is unpredictable and mysterious, you or me can't think of what will happen. My friends decides to go out for walk and later decided to have something; that's just when feel overjoy, it was the night, so cool and pleasant environment, I am person, always look at things and observes them critically, many times silence though I am with them, I lost myself in some curious and thoughtful imagination in the colorful world, because of which many times friends use to tell what are thinking- on the spot I just give them a smile and I disappear own my on world.

That day it was the shocking evening, though I knew the person... he is was quite fascinating and charming in his look but inside full of cow dunk, the mind he possess is so rigid...............I haven't forgotten

SOCIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS ON HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM

Today in 21st century education system is globalized and it has shaped to commercial marketing phenomena rather quality and value education. I personally afraid of what will happen knowledge system of education; will it be reliable and appropriate for society to suit in the epistemology of social, religion, economic, and political sphere. It seems to be more of competing in educational institution for profit base; commercialization, process of which many people are denied of, though they have also thought or aspire of becoming someone great in some field. Contemporary education system really ruin the originality of gaining knowledge and wisdom of quality and value education; rather it has created division in society based on economy, social, religion, political. The education is totally look at in the frame of power, position, prestige and money. The real value of education has lost which suppose to be integrity of people and it has shaped big hurdle brought bridges between elite and powerless. The hegemony of education since precolonial, colonial,  and post colonial it has been for the higher caste, powerful economic and numerical strength; though powerless try to be educated and become educated, it is the elite decision always be prominent, the voice of subaltern never heard of.

The power relation of education in elite always operate and powerless always denied even though they suggest, the subaltern educated voice is heard very minimal. And when education system is look at far and wide  and  analysed, the standard of education always look at mostly perspective of money power, high digitized and smart classroom which is actually commercial and profit base extracting money values from people; they are also taught mostly targeting to become rather looking at hurdle of student without understand much about psycho- social life of student. They (teachers, professor or lectures) simply stress on technical or robotic way of teaching like machine without much understanding of humanness and feeling which actually students go through great pain and difficulties.

There is an unrecognized of human relation and human value, the educated and well-known person always become the victim of politicians and owner of multinational company. The government makes policy and implementation in favor of development for the sake of elite class forgetting the marginalized community (SCs,STs and Backward Class). In development they hurt the sentiment and culture of those people and they are in identity crisis. The subjects taught is always concentrated towards elite and powerful profit base like growth of science, technology, economy and development of infrastructure. 

Therefore today's contemporary education system should have sociological analysis on understand the nature of student, family background, economic life, livelihood and psycho-social mentality of student. By which real education will be attain and can be holistic for human behavior and human progress. And this will lead to less suicidal of student, they will grow full way. The education ministry should also look at social aspect of student by providing them medical and counseling based on psycho-social, look at whole student equally without discrimination or bias.

Friday, 27 November 2015

COMMODIFICATION OF LAND DE-PEASANTISATION

COMMERCIALISATION OF AGRICULTURE

The British rule had pronounced and profound economic impact on India.The various economic policies followed by the British led to the rapid transformation of India's economy into a colonial economy whose nature and structure were determined by needs of the British economy. One important aspect of British economic policy was commercialization of agriculture.
The commercialization of agriculture means that the agricultural crops and goods are produced by the peasants for sale in the market and not for their own consumption. Commercialization of agriculture in India began during the British rule. The commercialization of Indian Agriculture took place not to feed the industries of India because India was far behind in industrial development as compared to Britain, France, Belgium and many other European countries of eighteenth century.
The commercialization of Indian Agriculture was done primarily to feed the British industries that it was taken up and achieved only in cases-of those agricultural products which were either needed by the British industries or could fetch cash commercial gain to the British in the European or American market.
For example, several efforts were made to increase the production of cotton in India to provide raw and good quality cotton to the cotton-textile industries of Britain which were growing fast after the Industrial Revolution in Britain. Therefore, cotton growing area increase in India and its production increased manifold with gradual lapse of time. Indigo and more than that, tea and coffee plantation were encouraged in India because these could get commercial market abroad.
Most of the plantations for commercial crops were controlled by the English. Jute was another product that received attention of the English company because the jute made products got a ready market in America and Europe. The commercialization of India agriculture was initiated in India by the British through their direct and indirect policies and activities.
Firstly, the new land tenure system introduced in form of permanent settlement and Ryotwari Settlement had made agricultural land a freely exchangeable commodity.
The Permanent settlement by giving ownership right to the zamindars created a class of wealthy landlords; they could make use of this ownership right by sale or purchase of land. Further, the agriculture which had been way of life rather than a business enterprise now began to be practiced for sale in national and international market.
Moreover, crops like cotton, jute, sugarcane, ground nuts, tobacco etc. which had a high demand in the market were increasingly cultivated. The beginning of the plantation crops like Tea, coffee, rubber, indigo etc heralded a new era in agricultural practices in India. These were essentially meant for markets and thus commercialization of agriculture took to new heights with the expansion of the British rule.
A large number of factors encouraged and facilitated commercialization of Indian agriculture. The political unity established by the British and the resultant rise of the unified national market was an important factor. Further, the spread of money economy replaced the barter and agricultural goods became market items.
Further, the replacement of custom and tradition by competition and contract also led to the commercialization of Indian agriculture was also aided by the expansion of means of transportation and communication. The laying of railway lines and expansion of rail and road transport enabled the transportation of agricultural products from production centers to markets.
Another boosting factor for commercialization of agriculture in India was the gaining of speed of Industrial Revolution in England. This led to factor in commercialization as more and more agricultural goods were produced to satisfy the demand for raw materials by the British industries. The enlargement and expansion of international trade and the entry of British finance capital also belted commercialization of agriculture.
This was especially so in cotton as the civil war disrupted the supplies of cotton from America and thereby increased demand for Indian cotton. Further, the British policy of one way free trade also acted as sufficient encouraging factor for commercialization as the manufactured items in textile, jute etc could find free entry in Indian markets, where as the manufactured goods did not have similar free access to European markets.
The commercialization of agriculture was a forced and artificial process for the majority of Indian peasants. It was introduced under coercion of the British and not out of the incentive of peasantry at large. The peasantry went for cultivation of commercial crops under duress.
He had to pay the land revenue due to the British government in time. Moreover, he had to grow commercial crop on a specified tract of his land under the oppression of planters. The peasants also went in for growing commercial crops to pay back the interests due to money lenders in time.
The commercialization of Indian agriculture started post 1813 when the industrial revolution in England gained pace. The commercialization of agriculture had many results. It was beneficial to the British planters, traders and manufacturers, who were provided with opportunity to make huge profits by getting the commercialized agricultural products at, throw away prices. The commercialization of Indian agriculture also partly benefited Indian traders and money lenders who made huge fortunes by working as middlemen for the British.
This regard they acted as conduits delivering the products from peasants to the British company from where it was taken abroad. Moreover, Indian money lenders advanced Cash advances to the farmers to cultivate the commercial crops and if the peasants failed to pay him back in time, the land of peasants came under ownership of moneylenders.
However, most of the Indian people suffered miserably due to the British policy of commercialization of Indian agriculture. It resulted in reduced area under cultivation of food crops. The net result of this change was that Indian failed to produce even that much food crops which could provide even two square meals a day to its population.
The misery was further enhanced became the population of India was increasing every year, fragmentation of land was taking place because of the increasing pressure on land and modern techniques of agricultural production were not introduced in India.
It affected adversely the poor people of India; it became difficult for them to get even sufficient food. This becomes ample from the fact that ill 1880 India had a surplus of foodstuffs to the extent of five million tons and by 1945 it had a deficit of 10 million tons.
The consumption of food was then estimated at one and a half lb per individual and in 1945 it was 1 lb. Nearly thirty percent of the Indian population was estimated to be suffering from chronic malnutrition and under nutrition. Thus, the commercialization of agriculture in India by the British was also one of the important causes of the impoverishment of the Indian people.
The poor peasant was forced to sell his produce just after harvest at whatever prices he could get as he had to meet in time the demands of the government, the landlord, the money lender and his family members' requirements. This placed him at the money of the grain merchant, who was in a position to dictate terms and who purchased his produced at much less than the market price. Thus, a large share of the benefit of the growing trade in agricultural products was reaped by the merchant, who was very often also the village money lender.
The net result of the commercialization of Indian agriculture was that most of Indian farmers failed to produce even that much food crops which could provide them even two square meals a day. Most importantly the life of the Indian peasant was tied to the highly fluctuating national and international market.
He was no longer a deciding factor in agricultural practices. Further, by making agricultural land a tradable commodity, the peasant lost his security feeling. High land revenue demand forced him to take loan from the money lender at high interest rates. Failure to pay debt in time meant loss of land to the money lender at high interest rates. It led to land alienation and increase in the number of agricultural labourers whose conditions especially in plantation industry was pathetic.
The commercialization of agriculture was a new phenomenon in Indian agriculture scene introduced by the British. While the upper class and British industries benefited-from it, the Indian peasants' life was tied to remote international market. The worst effect of commercialization was the oppression of Indian peasants at hands of European. This found expression in the famous Indigo revolt in 1859. Moreover, commercialization of Indian agriculture got manifested in series of famines which took a heavy toll of life.